The Examined Path Through Charitable giving across traditions

Every tradition that has thought seriously about wealth has concluded that giving is not optional — that to hold more than you need while others lack what they require is a form of injustice, not merely an absence of generosity. The mechanisms differ — tithe, zakat, dana, ubuntu — but the underlying claim is consistent: what you have is not entirely yours, and the portion that belongs to others demands accounting. Reason reaches this conclusion independently.

The course sequence, in order.

Each step builds on the last.