Refusal as Intellectual Practice
Using strategic refusal—of roles, expectations, and limits prescribed by cisgender identity—as a legitimate form of intellectual and personal work.
JuanaSor Juana ultimately refused to renounce her intellectual pursuits, refused to accept imposed limitations on her thinking, and refused the full surrender of self that her institution demanded—choices that cost her dearly but preserved her integrity. Refusal as Intellectual Practice names the deliberate, principled rejection of gendered expectations as itself a form of knowledge work and resistance. For those examining cisgender identity, refusal means consciously declining to perform cisgender role expectations that contradict your intellectual or personal commitments. This is not reckless rebellion but strategic choice. A cisgender woman might refuse to apologize for intellectual confidence. A cisgender man might refuse emotional suppression despite masculine expectations. This framework, drawn from Sor Juana's costly final refusals, recognizes that some constraints can only be challenged through active rejection. It asks: Where are you still complying with cisgender expectations you no longer accept? What would it mean to refuse, strategically and consciously? What would you risk, and what might you gain? Sor Juana's example suggests that refusal, though difficult, can be a form of intellectual integrity and personal freedom.
Ready to work on Refusal as Intellectual Practice?
Explore related journeys, or bring what you’re working through to Juana.