Talk it through with Aurelius
How do I write objectives that can actually be assessed?
Your objectives are the usual words — more strategic, better communication — and every review comes down to how the year felt rather than what happened.
◆ How this problem reads on the two dials
GuidanceKnowledge
1:1 with AureliusWith others (a Pod)
CRAFT at the far end. The independent-check test and the rewrite pattern are pure technique. Self-knowledge does not tell you that "be more strategic" cannot be assessed by two people separately.
How the two dials adapt to you →What’s really going on
Reviews feel arbitrary because the objectives were unassessable. There is one test that fixes it, and it takes about twenty minutes to rewrite a set.
🔒 What you’ll build togetherUnlock by starting
KnowledgeObjectives that can actually be assessed
A moveAsk whether vague objectives are protecting you from being measured. Sometimes they are, and that is worth knowing before you sharpen them.
What changes unlock by starting
- You can apply the independent-check test to any objective.
- Your objectives name the evidence in advance.
- The review argument stops being about effort.
One object, two jobs: a public answer to a real problem, and — the moment you start the chat — Aurelius’s live plan for your version of it.